Skip Navigation, Sitemap

Border Telegraph

Published: Wednesday, 12th November, 2008 6:00am

Council sees red over phone boxes

Profile by David Knox

Comments (0) | Print | Email

COUNCILLORS have hung up the phone on BT"s offer to adopt threatened boxes across the Borders.

A list of 40 traditional red phone boxes - including Newstead, Midlem,

Fountainhall, Clintmains, Earlston and Selkirk - all face the chop.

The local authority was asked to Adopt a Kiosk, where the phone was

removed and the box remains, or Sponsor a Kiosk, where a cashless phone

service is still provided within each box at a cost of £500 per year.

But both options got a harsh reception at yesterday"s Scottish Borders

Council Executive meeting.

Councillor Michael Cook blasted: 'This is an unappealing offer from BT

and they know that the council is not going to undertake something that

is ultimately their responsibility.

'I think we should fire a rocket back at BT and let them know what we

think of this.'

Members of the Executive voted unanimously to decline the offer from BT.

But planning director Ian Lindley said he would open up the offer to

community councils around the region.

He said: 'I have already had interest from some community councils.'

Red Gilbert Scott-designed phone boxes were launched in 1936 to

celebrate King George V"s silver jubilee.

editorial@bordertelegraph.com

Post a comment

Registered users log in here

If you are registered with us, you can login here. If you are not registered, do so now.
Once logged in you wont have to complete word verification each time you post.

Prefer not to register?

Usernames must be 4 - 20 characters. Registration only takes a few minutes. Registered users can also take part in competitions and other features of the site.


Enter the text as shown.

I want to...

Photosales Search

Looking for a picture from the newspaper?
Visit our photosales site and search now.

Vote

Border Telegraph Poll

Have you made up your mind who to vote for?

This Poll is now closed.

Yes (83.5%)

No (6.1%)

I would need to hear more (5.2%)

I won't vote at all (5.2%)

News from around the area