CONCERNS have been raised by Borders politicians despite a U-turn by the Scottish Government on its controversial ‘named person’ policy.

The move follows a ruling last year by the UK Supreme Court which found aspects of the SNP’s state guardian legislation unlawful.

Despite the climb-down, Conservatives John Lamont MP and MSP Rachel Hamilton have spoken out. 

While the pair welcomed a clarification from Holyrood on data sharing, they said “serious concerns” about the legislation still remain.

Ministers originally wanted the new law to enable information about children to be shared across agencies without the knowledge of parents.

But Education Secretary John Swinney announced this would only be permitted against the will of parents if there is an “overriding” interest to do so, such as to prevent a crime.

MP John Lamont, who until recently was the local MSP, said: “The named person scheme is deeply unpopular in the Scottish Borders and was a huge mistake from beginning to end. I did not support this policy in the Scottish Parliament and its implementation has been a complete shambles.

“The announcement from the Scottish Government effectively means that no parent will now be forced to accept the advice from a named person and refusal to do so won’t be treated as suspicious by authorities. It also effectively rules out the sharing of information about children without the permission of parents, except in very extreme circumstances.

“These announcements are certainly welcome and are a testament to the opposition to the scheme, led by the Scottish Conservatives.”

Rachael Hamilton newly-elected to replace him as MSP added: “Parents in the Borders have been rightly concerned about this scheme, which they see as an unacceptable intrusion into family life.

“Across the area, teachers will be expected to monitor and report on 14,500 children with no extra funding from the Scottish Government and minimal training.

“There is a real risk that teachers and health workers with already very demanding workloads are going to struggle. By forcing them to monitor every child, my concern is that it will make vulnerable children more likely to miss out on the help and support they need.

“The altered scheme proposed by the Scottish Government still raises many questions. It’s not too late for the Education Secretary to rethink the whole policy and instead set out plans to support vulnerable children without unnecessarily intruding into family life.”