Wind-farms generate debate in Lauder
THE owner of one of Scotland's oldest castles has warned wind-farms are destroying the Borders historic landscape.
Gerald Maitland-Carew, who runs Thirlestane Castle in Lauder, claimed more turbines were being built in the region than any other area of the country.
He believes they scarred the landscape and put tourists off visiting the Borders.
And, with plans for around 100 new turbines in the area, the Lord Lieutenant of Roxburgh, Ettrick and Lauderdale claimed "enough is enough".
However, if approved, Lauderdale Community Council revealed the wind-farms could generate as much as £2.5million for the local community over the next 25 years and be used to protect local services currently under-threat from closure following public spending cuts, such as the library and leisure centre, as well as set up a new youth group in the area.
Speaking to the Border Telegraph at a public exhibition on the future of wind farms held in Lauder Public Hall on Wednesday, Captain Maitland-Carew, the Queen's representative for the region, said: "We have got the most amazing landscape here that people from all over the world come to visit and I can't help but think it is being destroyed.
"In Lauder, we appear to be getting more wind-farms than anywhere else in Scotland - we are surrounded by them and I am terribly against it.
"I can understand why so many landowners and developers are keen to construct them because of the huge amount of public subsidies involved and the money that can be generated."
But he added: "These wind-farms are going to use more energy than they produce and people that live near them will suffer because, as well as destroying the landscape, they will affect the price of their property and impact on their health."
Plans for five new wind-farms in and around Lauder - Girthgate, Crosbie Moor, Brunta Hill, Rowantree and Shaw Park - were put on display ahead of a wind-farm hustings to be held in the Royal Burgh before the Scottish Parliament elections in May.
And, between them, they propose building 75 new turbines in the area, in addition to the wind farm already in existence on Soutra Hill and the 48 turbines being constructed at nearby Fallago Rig.
"Scottish Borders Council has in the past said that we don't want some of these wind farms that we are now surrounded with and the developers have appealed to the Scottish Government," Captain Maitland-Carew said.
"They say there is huge benefit to climate change but it's actually the opposite.
"No-one wants to come to the Borders to walk past these gigantic turbines - some of which are the height of the Eildon Hills - and I'm afraid it is doing nothing for tourism in the area."
Alistair Smith, chairman of Lauderdale Community Council, which organised the information day, said it was important that local residents had their say on all future wind-farm developments in the area.
"We have got a display on wind-farms which shows the good points and the bad points and we are asking the public for their views," he said.
"It's important that the community has its say because we need to know what they want." But he added: "The worry is only the objectors turn up to meetings and we don't hear from the people who want to support them."
A windfarm hustings planned to be held in Lauder on March 16, involving all political parties, has been postponed with a new date expected to be announced before the end of April.
This article appeared in Border Telegraph 15 Mar 11
Have your say. Post a comment on this article.
-
Mike
Unregistered User
Mar 17, 07:58
Report commentWind isn't the answer but it is part of an energy mix we need for the future. We can spare our oil to use it when wind isn't generating sufficiently, i.e. make our oil last longer- when the wind generates sufficiently it can form the base load for electricity along with solar.
Really, after what has happenned in Japan with nuclear is it really wise to be focusing on it on a large scale?
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 1
-
Mike5
Unregistered User
Mar 17, 07:58
Report commentWind isn't the answer but it is part of an energy mix we need for the future. We can spare our oil to use it when wind isn't generating sufficiently, i.e. make our oil last longer- when the wind generates sufficiently it can form the base load for electricity along with solar.
Really, after what has happenned in Japan with nuclear is it really wise to be focusing on it on a large scale?
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 1
-
Vindblaff
8 posts
Mar 17, 18:30
Report commentMike5
Please do some research: wind is not a base-load generator, in fact it is the exact opposite!
To quote a government minister in the last regime:
"In answer to the question that was asked earlier, wind generation is intermittent and therefore needs—may I use a technical term?—base-load capacity, which means we need to build for coal and gas to back up the wind. That is why it is not the most effective source in terms of energy security of supply, ..." (Baroness Vadera, BERR, House of Lords Energy Questions, 23 June 2008).
Nor do we use oil to generate power now, except in emergencies - as last December when wind was repeatedly failing to produce any significant power as load hit the 4th highest level on record.
Even the sainted Jonathan Porritt would disagree with you, he was head of the SDC when they wrote the most pro-wind report to date, which is invariably referenced by the BWEA, Greenpeace and FOE. It states: "It would be unrealistic to assume that wind energy would displace any nuclear capacity," ('Wind Power in the UK', Sustainable Development Commission. 2005. p35).
Nor is Solar PV anything other than a tiny factor in the generating picture.
Read National Grid's latest 'Seven Year Statement' (2010) if you want to find out what the keys issues are: http://www.nationalgrid.com/uk/Electricity/SYS/
The local Windbyte website also provides links to some interesting information on wind power generation: http://www.windbyte.co.uk/windpower.html
Recommend?
Yes 1
No 0
Return to the main index, get more from this section or browse our News archives.
Border Telegraph Poll
Do you think community councillors should support plans to spend £5,500 on a new lamp post in Galashiels to mark the Queen's Diamond Jubilee? See this week's Border Telegraph for more details.
This Poll is now closed.
Yes (17.1%)
No (70.7%)
Only if it lights up the whole of Gala (12.2%)










