Borders Rail Project at centre of cost-cutting claim

Published: 27 Jul 2012 09:304 comments

RAIL campaigners revealed they feared the brakes were being put on plans to reintroduce train services to the Borders for the first time in more than 40 years in a bid to save money.

Devegetation works have taken place in Galashiels to clear a path for the new line, like here at Asda.

Devegetation works have taken place in Galashiels to clear a path for the new line, like here at Asda.

It followed speculation that Transport Scotland, which is in charge of overseeing the much vaunted £295 million building project, is planning to reduce the length of crossing loops on the single line track in an attempt to cut costs.

However, the Campaign for Borders Rail warned that would increase journey times between Tweedbank and Edinburgh, beyond the 55 minute maximum currently planned, and end up costing more in the long term.

And now the local lobby group, which was setup to campaign for the restoration of the region's rail links, has written to the Scottish Transport Minister, Keith Brown, to seek assurances over the line's future.

They have also reiterated their plea for the two platforms proposed at the planned terminus in Tweedbank be extended, from the current six-coach specification for standard ScotRail services to 10 or 11 coaches in length, to accommodate so-called tourist trains which they claim could generate an extra half a million pounds for the local economy each year.

In his letter to the Transport Minister, Lorne Anton, chair of Campaign for Borders Rail, said: "The Campaign for Borders Rail views with increasing concern the substantial cut backs in the EGIP Programme for improving the rail service between Edinburgh and Glasgow.

"Of even greater concern to the Campaign are rumours of possible Transport Scotland proposals for reductions in the crossing loop lengths on the Borders Railway, which would result in increased journey times between the Borders and the Capital. Longer train journey times will reduce patronage and deter a modal shift by motorists from car to train.

"Taken in conjunction with the possibility that Tweedbank Station may not be capable of handling full-length passenger charter trains, with the resultant loss of economic benefits to the Borders and Midlothian, the Campaign is seriously concerned that the rail project will not be allowed to realise its full economic, social and environmental potential.

"It has been suggested that there would be later - post opening - opportunities to put right initial deficiencies in the specification for the railway, but implementing enhancements in an operational railway is much more expensive than doing the job properly at the outset.

"We urge the Scottish Government to provide early re-assurance that the journey time from Tweedbank to Edinburgh , and from Edinburgh to Tweedbank, will be the maximum 55minutes laid down in the specification in 2009, and that a way will be found to properly accommodate the tourist charter train market on the Borders Railway."

Earlier this year, a multi-million pound contract was awarded to develop the designs of the new rail route between Edinburgh and the Borders. Network Rail, the authority responsible for the country's rail network, announced it has appointed BAM Nuttall to assist in the delivery of the Borders Railway. It is hoped the first trains will run on the line by late 2014.

Mr Anton said: "The Campaign for Borders Rail remain totally supportive of all Government Departments and Agencies, both national and local, who are striving to deliver the best possible Borders Railway by 2014."

Transport Scotland this week insisted the speculation that the brakes were being put on plans to reintroduce train services to the Borders was way off track. A spokesperson said: "These claims are inaccurate. Bringing benefits for local communities and businesses in Midlothian and the Borders remains the key consideration in our work with Network Rail towards delivery of this project.

"Investigations undertaken during the Parliamentary process indicated that scheduled passenger services were the only viable option at that time. However, with the use of additional stewarding procedures, it would be possible to run charter trains to Tweedbank, without any additional costs or delay to the project."

And they added: "As we progress the detailed design our focus continues to be on journey time efficiency."

Jump to first paragraph.

Comments

Have your say - post a comment on this article

Registered users log in here
If you are registered with us, you can login here. If you are not registered, please do so now. Once logged in you wont have to complete word verification each time you post.

  • The Heretic
    Unregistered User
    Jul 30, 12:03
    Report abuse

    I'd strongly urge Transport Minister Brown to look very closely at the case put forward by the campaigners, and also to look further afield to locations where rail tours make a significant contribtion to an area's economic success if he requires further proof that there is much truth in the arguments for handling such tours.

    Too many times in the history of public sector investment, false 'economies' have resulted in wholly forseeable problems which have then dogged a project's success, even on occasions it's viability. Toying around with a well considered re-instatement scheme at the risk of permanently affecting the Borders Lines' ability to run a sensible timetable and preclude the line - and the district it serves - from earning extra income from the lucrative tour market would be short-sighted folly.

    Please Minister, don't spoil the ship for a ha'peth of tar.

    Recommend?   Yes 8     No 8

  • hazelkaye
    409 posts
    Jul 30, 19:11
    Report abuse

    First there was the "secret survey" that culled the bulk of the EGIP project!

    Don't be too surprised to find that the Borders Railway may be "next in line" for similar treatment!

    How ironic such puns are!

    Recommend?   Yes 7     No 0

  • jinman72
    10 posts
    Jul 30, 20:21
    Report abuse

    Why should we be surprised at the speculation over cutbacks to this project? I must admit, when I saw various photographs of clearance work this year from vegetation clearance to demolition of property that was allowed to be built on the route of the railway, I was building my hopes up that the project was still going ahead, but here we are again, scaremongering at the very least from someone! How many times have capital projects like this in the UK, both road and rail, been the subjects of cutbacks by the Treasury or whoever, only for alterations to be made at a later date, costing much more than originally specified?

    Recommend?   Yes 5     No 3

  • Aoxomoxoa
    Unregistered User
    Aug 1, 15:41
    Report abuse

    Told you. Too expensive and with no business case to support it. The promoters have been looking for potential cost saving exercises up and down the track for months, so this comes as no surprise to some of us.

    Oh - and to describe CBR as "Local"? Don't make me laugh - Lorne Anton lives nowhere near the area, and ought to keep his weasily nose out of things that don't concern him.

    Recommend?   Yes 6     No 2